Offshore Inn for International Real Estate, Overseas Jobs, Asset Protection, Expatriate Resources and Overseas Retirement
It is a peculiar irony. A year ago, the the UK’s Inland Revenue began a crackdown on offshore savings. Banks operating out of the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man had to hand over details of British customers, and depositors who confessed were rewarded with an amnesty. Thousands did and many must have given up on offshore savings. Inadvertently, the taxman’s crackdown must have saved some depositors from the collapse of the offshore subsidaries of Icelandic banks.
Thousands were not so lucky and could now lose most of their savings …
Consider if you will be a sole proprietorship, partnership or corporation.
‘You’re so lucky, being able to work abroad.’ I’ve forgotten how many times I’ve heard that statement.
If you have assets, you are most likely a target. When your assets are visible, you are the bullseye.
Do you need a job? Just got a question? Pop it in here and you’ll get an answer from our Inn Team.
Tip the scales in your favour, protect your home and family with asset protection programmes for partnerships, corporations and individuals.
In a short sale, banks forgive the difference between what is owed and the sale price of the house. Recently, however, banks have started giving cash back to the sellers. So far, the programs are a drop in the bucket. There are millions of pent-up foreclosures and JP Morgan is doing 5,000 short sales a month, hardly enough to make a dent.
Still, “short sales represented 9 percent of all U.S. residential transactions in November, the most recent month for which data is available, up from 2 percent in January 2008, according to Corelogic.”
Please consider Banks Paying Cash to Homeowners to Avoid Foreclosures
Banks, accelerating efforts to move troubled mortgages off their books, are offering as much as $35,000 or more in cash to delinquent homeowners to sell their properties for less than they owe.
Lenders have routinely delayed or blocked such transactions, known as short sales, in which they accept less from a buyer than the seller’s outstanding loan. Now banks have decided the deals are faster and less costly than foreclosures, which have slowed in response to regulatory probes of abusive practices. Banks are nudging potential sellers by pre-approving deals, streamlining the closing process, forgoing their right to pursue unpaid debt and in some cases providing large cash incentives, said Bill Fricke, senior credit officer for Moody’s Investors Service in New York.
Losses for lenders are about 15 percent lower on the sales than on foreclosures, which can take years to complete while taxes and legal, maintenance and other costs accumulate, according to Moody’s. The deals accounted for 33 percent of financially distressed transactions in November, up from 24 percent a year earlier, said CoreLogic Inc., a Santa Ana, California-based real estate information company.
Karen Farley hadn’t made a mortgage payment in a year when she got what looked like a form letter from her lender.
“You could sell your home, owe nothing more on your mortgage and get $30,000,” JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) said in the Aug. 17 letter obtained by Bloomberg News.
Tom Kelly, a JPMorgan spokesman, declined to comment on the company’s incentives.
“When a modification is not possible, a short sale produces a better and faster result for the homeowner, the investor and the community than a foreclosure,” he said in an e-mail.
Lenders spend an average of 348 days to foreclose in the U.S. and an additional 175 days to sell the property, according to RealtyTrac. In New York, a state that requires court approval for repossessions, it takes about four years to foreclose on a home and then resell it, the company said.
Lenders can often afford to forgive debt, offer the incentive and still make a profit because they purchased the loan from another bank at a discount, said Trent Chapman, a Realtor who trains brokers and attorneys to negotiate with banks for short sales.
What’s Really Going on Here?
If the answer is “it’s faster, quicker, cheaper” than foreclosures, then why don’t we see more of them, lots more of them?
Could it be these are the real problem loans with clouded titles, questionable practices by lenders, or huge numbers of written complaints by borrowers? Add to that a dearth of willing new borrowers and I think you have the answer.
Mike “Mish” Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com
Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post List
Nicholas Noe argues that an internationally led reconciliation effort and subsequent peace-keeping presence in Syria would bypass the resulting destruction of a military intervention or civil war, while still keeping the diplomatic upper hand.
Elliott Abrams says the United States must take the steps to ensure the demise of the Assad regime in Syria.
Adam Liptak of the New York Times writes that the U.S. Constitution no longer acts as the model for modern states. He cites the consitution’s conservative interpretation and relatively few secured rights in making it a poor model in light of newer constitutions that reflect modern values and contexts.
I do not know enough about algorithm-driven High Frequency Trading to comment intelligently other than to say 100% without a doubt that someone is making a huge pile of cash from HFT or it would not be done.
You can watch an animated GIF that chronicles the rise of the HFT Algo Machines from January 2007 through January 2012 by clicking on the link.
The GIF starts out slow and boring, but watch the progression through the end.
Mike “Mish” Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com
Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post List
Steve Coll, Robert Grenier, and Daniel Markey look at changes in U.S.-Pakistan relations over the past year and make recommendations for moving forward.
Robert M. Danin states, “Monday’s Fatah-Hamas unity agreement announced in Doha marks the latest in a series of unimplemented accords between the two Palestinian adversaries.”
CFR’s James M. Lindsay discusses Nelson Mandela’s release from prison in February 1990 and his subsequent rise to the presidency to show how individuals shape history.
Jagdish Bhagwati criticizes U.S. President Barack Obama for failing to close the Doha Round, decrying outsourcing, and surrending to the “manufactures fetish.”
The Merkel proposal for Greece to cede budget sovereignty to a European commissioner has finally been trashed. In its place is a Spaghetti-O loop proposal to give Greece money only if Greece earmarks the funds to immediately pay back bondholders.
Please consider Greece bail-out funds could be split
European officials are insisting any new Greek bail-out programme specifically earmark funds to pay off remaining holders of Greek debt, giving lenders the freedom to withhold aid to Athens without risking a messy default that could reignite panic in financial markets.
Under a new Franco-German plan that senior European officials said is likely to be included in a new Greek rescue, eurozone officials would create an escrow account to accept new bail-out funding instead of paying it all directly to Athens as in the past.
The new fund would then ensure bondholders are paid off, while additional cash to run the Greek government could still be withheld if Athens did not live up to tough new reform demands.
Eurozone officials said they believed the escrow account would give European Union and International Monetary Fund lenders strong control over Greece’s use of bail-out funds without stripping Athens of its budgetary sovereignty
“This is a better idea than the proposal of a debt commissar,” said the senior French official. “It is more acceptable.”
Although the idea originated in Berlin, Nicolas Sarkozy, the French president, embraced it during a news conference with his German counterpart, Angela Merkel, following a joint cabinet meeting between the two governments in Paris. Ms Merkel also signalled her support, saying it would ensure “this money will be reliably accessible”.
Mathematical Nonsense
The proposal is of course mathematical nonsense, at least in regards to the portion of money going straight back to the bondholders (most of it).
In regards to the portion that goes to Greece, I still have to wonder.
Creditors either give Greece the money or don’t. Once again, there is little reason for the middleman unless they want the IMF to be the judge as to whether or not Greece is living up to the agreements.
Essentially, the EMU is taking 130 billion out of their wallet, putting 110 billion (or whatever) right back in their wallet and calling it 130 billion in “new funding”.
The only thing that can be construed of as “new funding” is the additional amount that actually goes to Greece.
Why the Mathematical Farce?
I suspect the answer is to make it appear as if Greece is paying back debts, when it isn’t.
Weren’t dotcom and mortgage frauds based on the same methodology? In the case of dotcoms, intracompany arrangements were made to make it appear there were actual revenue flows when there weren’t. In the case of housing, such maneuvers could be used to make it appear someone was making payments on their mortgage when they really weren’t.
This setup is either mathematical ignorance or a scam to prevent triggering of credit default swaps. I lean towards the latter.
Mike “Mish” Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com
Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post List
Ed Husain argues that it is impossible to tell whether Bashar al-Assad’s time is running out, but containing–not fanning–the current conflict in Syria is in everybody’s interests.
Ed Husain argues that it is impossible to tell whether Bashar al-Assad’s time is running out, but containing–not fanning–the current conflict in Syria is in everybody’s interests.
Along with many others, I am pondering the latest employment numbers. Strong opinions are the norm.
Many are steadfast in their interpretations, some critically so, especially Bondad who blasted Zero Hedge in a scathing attack “No Rick Santelli and Zero Hedge, One Million People Did Not Drop Out of the Labor Force Last Month“
Does Bondad Have a Point?
The short answer is yes. I wonder if I escaped attack because of a statement in my post Nonfarm Payroll +243,000 ; Unemployment Rate 8.3%; Those Not in Labor Force Rose an Amazing 1,177,000 as follows:
Some of those labor force numbers are due to annual revisions. However, the point remains: People are dropping out of the labor force at an astounding, almost unbelievable rate, holding the unemployment rate artificially low.
Emphasis in red as written, not added.
I could have, and should have expounded on the first sentence, even though I stick with what I said in the second sentence.
Bondad is generally a good guy and he also has the coolest dog in blogosphere, even though we fundamentally differ on politics.
Meet Bondad’s Dog “Weimar”
Zero Hedge replied in Explaining Yesterday’s Seasonally Adjusted Nonfarm Payroll “Beat”
Does Zero Hedge have a point?
Yes, even though he is scrambling hard to make it.
Been there. Done that. It happens. No one is perfect, certainly not me.
Trim Tabs has Firm Opinion Too
BLS Data Skewed?
Based on federal income tax receipts Trim Tabs asks Is BLS Data Skewed?
Our estimate of a slowly growing economy is based primarily upon daily income tax collections. Either there is something massively changed in the income tax collection world, or there is something very suspicious about today’s Bureau of Labor Statistics hugely positive number. We continue to check and recheck our analysis of income tax collections. We are aware that another service believes that incomes are growing faster than we do. So far we have not found any errors or discrepancies in our work, but if we do, we will let you know.
I keep repeating that the BLS refuses to use the data embedded in income tax collections to be able to report real time jobs and wages. Why does it refuse? Could the reason it refuses to use real time data on jobs and incomes be because perhaps this jobs number is politically motivated? The entire world is looking at US job creation as a proxy on how well Obama is doing? Could the Obama administration be pressuring its economist employees to create the best possible new jobs number?
Obamanomics?
Readers should know by now that I discount most conspiracy theories. It’s not that I believe conspiracies don’t happen, but rather those that do are quickly exposed. Paulson used a bazooka right out in the open to force Bank of America to merge with Merrill Lynch. Geithner and others are guilty as well. It was all very visible and quickly reported.
Is the BLS purposely manipulating numbers to benefit Obama? I rather doubt it. Someone would know and yap.
Yet, I have no explanation for payroll tax data. Some things do not add up, and it’s best to look at things from more than one angle.
So let’s take a closer scrutiny of the data to see what’s happening.
The Case for Headline Payroll +243,000
Let’s start off with the absolute best case anyone can make for the bullish jobs case.
The above chart is condensed from the January 2012 Non-Manufacturing ISM Report On Business®
ISM Questions and Answers
There are still questions about seasonal adjustments, confirming data, etc. but those are relatively good ISM numbers.
Let’s turn our attention to the unemployment rate.
Civilian Labor Force
The BLS labor force numbers seem suspect. The labor force is less now than when the recession ended 2.5 years ago.
Current Labor Force: 154,395,000.
June 2009 Labor Force: 154,730,000.
Based on trends, the labor force ought to be close to 160,000,000.
Boomer demographics can explain part of the “trendline failure”, but not all of it. The US is adding work-aged population every year, just at a decreasing rate. In other words, the labor force should be rising, even if at a reduced rate (at least in theory).
What Rate?
In 2000, it took about 150,000 jobs a month to keep up with birthrate and immigration, Recently Bernanke stated the number is 125,000 jobs. Could it be lower? Certainly, but the number is not zero.
Total Nonfarm Employees
There are currently 132,409,000 nonfarm employees. In December of 2000 there were 132,481,000 employees. How’s that for job growth?
Civilian Employment
Civilian employment is currently 141,637,000.
In May of 2005 civilian employment was 141,609,000.
Civilian Unemployment Rate
The recession ended in June of 2009. The labor force was 154,730,000. The Labor force is now 154,395,000. Is this credible? If it’s not credible, then neither is the unemployment rate!
Unemployment Rate What If?
Labor Force 155,000,000 8.6%
Labor Force 156,000,000 9.2%
Labor Force 157,000,000 9.8%
Labor Force 158,000,000 10.4%
Labor Force 159,000,000 10.9%
Labor Force 160,000,000 11.5%
At a very modest labor force growth to 157 million (a mere 90,800 a month since the recession ended), the unemployment rate would be 9.8%.
Using Bernanke’s estimate of 125,000 jobs a month, the labor force would be 158,480,000 and the unemployment rate would be 10.6%. Growing at the trend, the unemployment rate would be 11.5%.
Has Time Rewritten Every Lie?
To paraphrase Barbara Streisand) “Can it be all so simple then, or has time rewritten every lie?”
Are You “Really” Unemployed?
Link if video does not play: The Unemployment Game Show: Are You “Really” Unemployed?
Please play the video. It’s hilarious.
In regards to the wild jump in “those not in the labor force” in relation to growth in overall population, the BLS notes “the population increase was primarily among persons 55 and older and, to a lesser degree, persons 16 to 24 years of age. Both these age groups have lower levels of labor force participation than the general population.”
Forced Retirement
The BLS argument may sound plausible but I do not buy it. Persons 55-62 will still generally be looking for a job. Even many older than 65 will still be looking for a job because they cannot afford to retire.
Instead, I propose a combination of three factors.
Gallup Chimes In
Gallup reports that unemployment is 8.6% not seasonally-adjusted. That is close to the BLS number, but Gallup is based on those 18 and older while the BLS is 16 and older.
Otherwise, the sampling metrics are similar. The biggest difference appears in the actual count of underemployment (unemployed + those wanting a full-time job but only finding part-time work).
Please consider a pair of charts from the Gallup report U.S. Unemployment Up, to 8.6% in January
Percentage of US Workers in Part-Time Jobs, Wanting Full-Time Employment
Underemployment, a measure that combines the percentage of workers who are unemployed with the percentage working part time but wanting full-time work, surged to 18.7% in January. This is a worsening from the 18.3% of December but is still below the 19.0% of a year ago.
Total Underemployment
BLS Alternative Measures
click on chart for sharper image
The BLS “alternative” measure of underemployment is 16.2% (not seasonally adjusted) compared with 18.7% as surveyed by Gallup. As noted above, Gallup does not include results of those aged 16 and 17 while the BLS does (otherwise Gallup’s numbers would be higher still).
Which set of numbers tells the better story? Here’s a hint “It’s not the BLS”.
I will stick with what I have said on many occasions “People are dropping out of the labor force at an astounding, almost unbelievable rate, holding the unemployment rate artificially low.”
The reason is not a recount based on the 2010 census, nor is it purely demographics, nor is it Obamanomics. The reason is severe and sustained fundamental economic weakness, coupled with existing purposely-distorted definitions of what constitutes “unemployment”.
Mike “Mish” Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com
Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post List
The Russian and Chinese veto of a UN Security Council resolution calling for an end to violence in Syria calls into question the viability of the Responsibility to Protect doctrine and poses a dilemma for the Obama administration, says CFR’s Stewart Patrick.
Leslie H. Gelb says Israeli threats undercut prospects for a settlement with Iran.
Amid increasing fears of a civil war in Syria following the failure of the UN Security Council resolution, analysts remain divided over the question of intervention and how best to address the crisis.
This Congressional Research Service report describes the potential pitfalls of improperly managed defense budget cuts by recalling the notion of the “hollow force” in U.S. military history–a superficially battle-ready military force that, upon closer inspection, reveals itself to be inadequately prepared.
I am not a fan of Mitt Romney. Thus I am not displaying bias when I say the ire over what Romney pays in taxes is misplaced.
Caroline Baum has an excellent article on Bloomberg today that points to real source of the problem: Never Mind the Tax Cheats — Go After the Tax Code
Millionaires paying an effective 15 percent tax rate because their income is from investments? Blame the tax code. Carried interest, a form of income that accrues to hedge fund and private equity managers, taxed at the more favorable capital gains rate? The tax code’s the culprit.
Yes, there are a lot of tax cheats out there who aren’t playing by the rules. What Obama objects to — Warren Buffett playing a lower effective tax rate than his secretary — is ordained by the grotesque, 72,536-page tax code.
In researching a recent column, I went back to “The Flat Tax,” published by economists and Hoover Institution fellows Robert Hall and Alvin Rabushka in 1985. They proposed a revenue-neutral flat tax of 19 percent. All income would be taxed once, and only once, at the same rate and as close to the source as possible. “Whenever different forms of income are taxed at different rates or different taxpayers face different rates,” they write, “the public figures out how to take advantage of the differential.”
Bingo. I’m no tax expert — I have trouble gathering all the necessary information to take to the accountant once a year — but I know enough to recognize that the tax code is the problem, not the folks who capitalize on its myriad of loopholes.
Whether it’s a flat tax or a national retail sales tax, simpler is better: for each of us and for the economy overall. So the next time the president says he wants everyone to play by the rules, please tell him it’s the rules that are broken — not to mention the rule-makers.
Tax Law Keeps Piling Up
Image from Tax Law Pile Up
Are the Rules Broken or the Rule-Makers?
If one need collect taxes as close to the source as possible, the same can be said for the source of the problem. Congress cannot resist tinkering, with anything and everything.
The image above shows what 90 years of tinkering have done. Heck, from 1984 until now, 46,236 pages of tax code have been added.
There are breaks for mortgages, charitable deductions, hedge funds, the oil industry, home builders, and too many things to mention. Instead of fixing the problem at the source, Congress added an “Alternative Minimum Tax”.
102% Tax rate?
New York Times reporter James Stewart says he was “dismayed” by his own tax rate as compared to Romney, so he invited readers to send e-mails disclosing their tax rates and circumstances. Stewart was “deluged with submissions”.
One respondent, James Ross, a founder and managing member of Rossrock, a Manhattan-based private investment firm that focuses on commercial real estate and distressed commercial mortgages beat everyone hands down.
Let’s pick up the story from there as reported by the NYT in At 102%, His Tax Rate Takes the Cake
“My entire taxable income, plus some, went to the payment of taxes,” Mr. Ross said. “This does not include real estate taxes, sales taxes and other taxes I paid for 2010.” When he told friends and family, they were “astounded,” he said.
That doesn’t mean Mr. Ross pays more in taxes than he earns. His total tax as a percentage of his adjusted gross income was 20 percent, which is much lower than mine.
That’s because Mr. Ross has so many itemized deductions. Since taxable income is what’s left after itemized deductions like mortgage interest, charitable contributions, and state and local taxes are subtracted, it will nearly always be smaller than adjusted gross income and demonstrates how someone can pay more than 100 percent of taxable income in tax. Mr. Ross must hope that his interest expense will pay off down the road and generate some capital gains.
How could Mr. Ross pay so much? I thought I was the victim of a perfect storm of punitive tax policies, but Mr. Ross’s situation is worse.
Like me, he lives and works in New York City, which all but guarantees a high tax rate. Nearly all of his income is earned income and thus fully taxable at top rates. (He said that’s not always the case, but given the recent dire condition of real estate, in 2010 he had few capital gains and his carried interest didn’t yield any income.) Unlike me, he can’t make any itemized deductions, which means his adjusted gross income exceeds $1 million, the level at which New York State eliminates all itemized deductions, except for 50 percent of the value of charitable contributions. Mr. Ross said he gave 11 percent of his adjusted gross income to charity.
That means Mr. Ross can’t deduct any interest expense on the money he borrows to finance his real estate investments, which is substantial, nor can he deduct any other expenses or other itemized deductions except for part of his charitable contributions. This means he pays an enormous amount in state and local taxes. Since those are among the deductions that are disallowed when computing the federal alternative minimum tax, Mr. Ross is in turn especially hard hit by the A.M.T.
Mr. Ross said he asked his accountant what he could do. “He said, ‘Fire everyone here and move to Florida,’ ” according to Mr. Ross. He employs 10 people in his New York office.
Seriously Inane Proposals
One extremely misguided soul proposed in a comment on my blog the other day that it would be “fair” if everyone paid the same percentage of their income for things.
Under this proposal, one would need to provide proof of income to buy anything. Then, those with $1 income would get everything for free because a percentage of $1 does not go far. Those who make a $million would pay $400 or whatever for a loaf of bread. Clearly this proposal is inane, yet such misguided ideas are likely behind the absurd complexity of the AMT.
Simple Solution
The simple solution is to scrap the tax code entirely and start all over, with a blank slate.
The only fair way to do things is for everyone to be treated equally. No breaks for homeowners, no alternative minimum tax, no graduated taxes just simple set of flat taxes.
Since we need to promote more savings, I would rather see a national sales tax as opposed to an income tax. Regressive? Nope. It does not have to be.
I propose no tax on food, medicine and medical supplies, shelter, and clothes. Since a huge percentage of income of the poor goes to food shelter and clothes, no one can scream “regressive”.
Still, everyone would be treated equally, unlike say a mortgage deduction which only benefits homeowners. Everyone does eat, and need shelter.
How about a combination flat income tax and national sales tax, perhaps split 50-50 keeping the tax collection revenue neutral?
Those who “buy things” other than food, shelter, and clothes (notably the wealthy), would perforce pay a higher share yet everyone would be treated equally under the law.
Moreover, a sales tax is as close to the source as one can get. So is an income tax with no deductions.
What we cannot do is think 72,536 pages of tax code can be fixed. It can’t. It’s time to start all over with a blank slate and ideally 500 pages of tax code or less.
Mike “Mish” Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com
Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post List
This Congressional Research Service report focuses on the legal issues of wartime detention, with special emphasis on how it applies to U.S. citizens and residents after September 11, 2001.
(5 out of 5) (5 out of 5) (5 out of 5) (5 out of 5) (5 out of 5) (5 out of 5) (5 out of 5) (5 out of 5) (5 out of 5) (5 out of 5)